Analysis Examples of Integrated Assessment Model DNE21
Integrated Assessment Model DNE21 - Energy Systems Model
"New Earth 21" Project
Integrated Assessment Model DNE21
Energy Systems Model
"Bottom-up" modeling for technologies on energy supply side and CO2 capture & sequestration
→ Larger-scale picture (206kB)
An example of the model assumptions can be seen by a click of a part in the picture.
Energy Systems Model
Assumption of Primary Energy Resources and the Supply Costs
Assumption of fossil fuel resources and the production costs
Assumed Fossil Fuel Resources
Conventional | Non-conventional | ||
---|---|---|---|
Proved recoverable reserves | Other reserves and resources | ||
Oil | 150 | 145 | 2,343 |
Natural Gas | 129 | 265 | 19,306 |
Hard coal | Brown coal | ||
Coal | 5,646 | 599 |
Unit: Gtoe, Source: H-H.Rogner, 1997
The production costs of fossil fuels are assumed to increase by the increase of the cumulative productions.
Assumption of renewable energies and the production cost
Assumption of energy and CO2 transportation Costs
The transportation costs of natural gas, hydrogen and CO2 are relatively high. The transportation costs by pipeline depend strongly on the transportation distances.
Assumption of Energy Conversion Efficiency and Facility Costs
Assumption of electricity generation costs
Unit construction cost ($/kW) | |||
---|---|---|---|
Y2000 | Y2030 | Y2100 | |
Natural Gas | 500 - 1060 | 500 - 780 | 500 |
Oil | 270 - 410 | 270 - 350 | 270 |
Coal (De-S) | 970 - 2050 | 1010 - 1550 | 1050 |
IGCC with CO2 capture | 1240 - 2170 | 1260 - 1770 | 1300 |
Biomass | 1230 | 1000 | 1000 |
Methanol | 1200 | 900 | 600 |
Hydrogen | 1100 | 800 | 500 |
Nuclear | 1790 - 2620 | 1840 - 2260 | 1900 |
Elec. storage (water pumping) | 1000 - 1500 | 1000 - 1300 | 1000 |
Unit generation cost ($/MWh) | |||
Y2000 | Y2030 | Y2100 | |
Hydro & Geoth. | 10 - 180 | 10 - 180 | 10 - 180 |
Wind | 70 - 340 | 52 - 251 | 42 - 206 |
Photovoltaics | 235 - 469 | 83 - 166 | 42 - 83 |
Note: The ranges of the unit construction costs and electricity generation costs are due to the cost differences among the regions and also the cost distribution within the region.
Source: NEA/IEA, "Projected Costs of Generating Electricity: Update 1998", OECD, 1998. etc.
Assumption of electricity generation efficiency
Y2000 | Y2030 | Y2050 | Y2100 | |
---|---|---|---|---|
Natural Gas | 47.0 | 54.8 | 60.0 | 65.0 |
Oil | 36.0 | 46.4 | 49.0 | 49.0 |
Coal (De-S) | 40.7 | 46.3 | 50.0 | 55.0 |
IGCC with CO2 capture | 36.0 | 42.6 | 47.0 | 52.0 |
Biomass | 24.1 | 40.6 | 45.0 | 45.0 |
Methanol | 44.9 | 51.6 | 55.0 | 60.0 |
Hydrogen | 51.4 | 54.1 | 55.9 | 65.0 |
Elec. storage (water pumping) | 70.0 | 75.0 | 75.0 | 75.0 |
Note: The unit is LHV-base %. The efficiency of electricity generation of IGCC with CO2 capture includes the energy loss necessary for CO2 capture. Though the efficiencies in the model are assumed for each of the 10 regions, the above efficiencies are for Japan.
Assumption of chemical plants
Energy conversion process | Unit construction cost ($/(toe/day)) |
Operating rate (%) | Conversion efficiency (%) |
---|---|---|---|
Coal gasification | 203,000 | 90 | 61 |
Natural gas splitting | 164,000 | 90 | 76 |
Biomass gasification | 193,000 | 90 | 52 |
Shift reactor conv. process | 14,000 | 90 | 99 |
Methanol synthesis from CO | 113,000 | 90 | 62 |
Methanol synthesis from CO2 | 126,000 | 90 | 62 |
Methane synthesis | 112,000 | 90 | 77 |
Water electrolysis | 223,000 | 90 | 80-90 |
Oil refinery distillation | 29,000 | 70 | 95 |
Oil refinery gasoline prod. | 42,000 | 70 | 90 |
Coal liquefaction | 200,000 | 90 | 67 |
Biomass liquefaction | 230,000 | 90 | 75 |
Up-grading of methanol to gasoline | 46,000 | 70 | 93 |
Note: The conversion efficiencies are the values in the case of electricity generation efficiency of 33%. The conversion efficiency of water electrolysis is assumed to improve as time goes on.
Assumption of CO2 recovery efficiency and the facility costs
Unit construction cost ($/(tC/day)) |
Required electricity (MWh/tC) |
Recovery ratio of CO2 (%) |
|
---|---|---|---|
Chemical recovery of flue gas from electric power plants | 56,500 | 0.927 - 0.719 | 90 |
Physical recovery from gasification plants | 14,500 | 0.902 - 0.496 | 90 |
Note: Energy efficiency is assumed to improve within the above values as time goes on.
Assumption of capacitis and costs of CO2 sequestration
Assumption of future final energy demands in Reference Case
The model uses the growth rate of final energy demands per GDP, which is derived for each kind of fuel and electricity from B2 Scenario (the original is the medium scenario of United Nations (UN) in 1998) on the "Special Report on Emissions Scenarios (SRES)" of Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change (IPCC). The assumed final energy demands for the 10 world regions are calculated by the synthesis of the above growth rate and the GDP assumption.
The assumption of final energy demands are for the Reference Case, and the final energy demands in the case of global warming mitigation or CO2 reduction policy are calculated by the model.
Assumption of final energy demand by region in Reference Case
Assumption of final energy demand by fuel in Reference Case
Assumption of growth of final energy demand (%/yr)
Y1980-2000 | Y2000-2020 | Y2020-2050 | Y2050-2100 | |
---|---|---|---|---|
World average | 1.4 | 1.8 | 1.6 | 0.8 |
Japan | 2.0 | 0.6 | -0.3 | -0.7 |